Jamaica Gleaner
Published: Sunday | March 7, 2010
Home : In Focus
Fiscal policy in a time of economic crisis
Bullock

Colin F Bullock, Contributor

This article was presented at a Plan-ning Institute of Jamaica/Depart-ment of Economics seminar on The IMF Agreement: Implications for the Jamaican Economy at the UWI Library Multifunctional Room on February 25, 2009.

Jamaica's macroeconomic problems recall that other meaning of IMF: It's mainly fiscal. It is persuasively arguable that all the current problems of low growth, higher-than-desired inflation and interest rates and chronic public debt all result from governments' protracted inability to finance its expenditure without substantial reliance on borrowing.

Jamaica's crisis of debt returning to 140 per cent of gross domestic product (GDP) and debt servicing requiring 60 per cent of Government expenditure is the result of years of accumulated failure of government to balance its expenditure with the availability of non-borrowed resources. After improvements to the middle of the 1990s, Jamaica's public finances were significantly affected by the costs of resolving the financial sector crisis. The first years of the new millennium, despite failure to perform as well as expected, saw steady, if slow and uneven, improvements in the public finances. Over the last two years, factors, including serial overoptimistic revenue projections and the global economic crisis, have generated a marked worsening of the imbalance between government revenue and expenditure.

problem correction

Over the last two years, by International Monetary Fund (IMF) statistics, public sector employee emoluments increased from nine to 12 per cent of GDP, purchases of goods and services from six to seven per cent of GDP, interest expense from 11.5 to 16 per cent of GDP and capital expenditure from 3.0 to 3.5 per cent of GDP with the central government deficit increasing from four to 10 per cent of GDP. The increase in interest expense has been driven largely by domestic interest, as external interest payments remained below four per cent of GDP.

Correction of the problem through the IMF programme visualises a simultaneous reduction of the burden of interest expense and an increase in the surplus without fiscal expense (the primary surplus). The former has been facilitated by the Jamaica Debt Exchange (JDX), but the latter will require stronger collection of taxes and moderation of non-interest expenditure. The moderation of non-interest expenditure is expected to be facilitated by public sector restructuring, to be informed by a sitting task force. Divestment and restructuring of public enterprises is also expected to reduce the drain of these institutions on public finances.

The medium-term macroeconomic objectives of the programme are not spectacular. Up to 2013-14 growth is not expected to exceed two per cent per annum. Inflation is expected to fall to six per cent, but there are concerns about the likely impact of taxation, utility rates, user fees and oil prices related to international economic reco-very. A gradual decline in expenditure/GDP is expected but revenue/GDP, despite multiple tax packages and tax administration reform, is not expected to increase significantly. After the initial impact of the JDX, interest rates are expected to decrease slowly and, by 2014-15, the primary surplus would increase to nine per cent of GDP, the fiscal deficit would fall to about 1.0 per cent of GDP and public sector debt to 114 per cent of GDP. Net International Reserves are expected to decline sharply before the beginning of a slow recovery.

medium-term targets

While the medium-term macroeconomic targets are not overwhelming, there are factors which place the near-term public finance targets at risk. Revenue expectations may be overoptimistic due to withholding tax and tax refunds due and to a continuation of very weak productive activity.

If revenue is facilitated by inflation, this will not only undermine the inflation objective but also interest rate, exchange rate and net international reserve objectives. There is a continued announcement of large debt-financed projects without any clarity that these can be accommodated within the tight budgetary constraints expected for the next financial year.

The expectations for eliminating public-enterprise deficits may be unrealistic, a prospect influenced by the most recent abortion of the sugar-divestment process. Despite the massive infusion of multilateral financing, Government may need significant recourse to financial markets sooner, rather than later, and may face refinancing challenges in the wake of the JDX.

While the medium-term macroeconomic objectives do not significantly reduce the susceptibility of the economy to adverse economic shocks, the near-term targets are fraught with risk. This then points to an examination of the structural objectives of the programme as being possibly the more fundamental targets for the multilaterals. The IMF itself recognises severe "downside risks" to the programme but hopes successful implementation of the structural

changes may set off a virtuous train of positive outcomes. It is readily apparent that structural change that enhances capacity to meet fiscal and other programme objectives will also enhance Jamaica's capacity to service its debt, which will certainly increase in the near term.

reform objectives

Structural reform objectives, as they relate to the public finances, include the following:

1. Fundamental public-sector reform to enhance public sector efficiency and reduce the weight of public sector employee compensation.

2. Rationalisation and reform of Jamaica's public entities, including divestment, mergers and closures.

3 . Unifying and enhancing the efficiency of tax administration and sharply reducing the incidence of incentives and "discretionary waivers".

4. Establishment of a central treasury management system to enhance the efficiency and cost effectiveness of government cash management.

5. Legislation of a fiscal responsibility framework to increase the certainty of attainment of programmed and budgeted fiscal objectives.

6. The enhancement of the active debt-management capabilities of government.

Regarding tax policy and administration reform, there is concern that the fiscal adjustment process has relied heavily on large tax packages while fundamental expenditure reform awaits completion of protracted and meticulous study. While this study is important, it is to be emphasised that relying on increased taxes, in a severely depressed economy, has less certainty of success than measured expenditure contraction. Revenue continues to underperform programmed expectations.

The intended integration of tax administration is positive and it is hoped that this lays to rest the concept of separation of customs as an executive agency. This separation does not facilitate essential communication between revenue departments and does not enhance the efficient integrated management of fiscal policy.

A lot has been made of "discretionary waivers" but the reality is that most of these waivers are legal entitlements associated with terms of employment or the institutional status of religious, charitable or business organisations. Administration may be tightened to limit abuse but, unless there is legislative change within fundamental tax reform, there is not a lot of saving to be anticipated.

largest quantitative problem

The quantitatively largest problem for the revenue is the massive antiquated system of tax incentives dating back to the 1950s. This system relates to outdated perspectives on how to increase the diversity and dynamism of the Jamaican economy and, while we understand that there is a significant loss of potential revenue to these incentives, there is no economic accounting for "benefits".

Regarding expenditure reform, the benefits of the JDX have to be sustained by substantial near-term macroeconomic improvement to avoid reversal of interest rate reduction. It is unfortunate that public sector reform, including employment, wages and incentives, have to lag so far behind initial efforts to arrest the crisis by tax packages.

Reducing public sector employment raises the issue of redundancy costs and the matter of retaining and attracting high quality staff for the new and improved public sector. There is no mention of public sector pension reform. Freezing allocations for 2010-11, is, without a redefinition of scope and functions, a recipe for inefficiency, waste and continued failure to meet targets. There is also a need to discontinue the creation of public edifices that have no capacity to pay for themselves.

The ambitious targets for public-enterprise deficits require more detailed analysis of the several public enterprises that have been a public financial burden. There will be continuing carrying costs for sugar and, while targets may be adjusted for the costs of Air Jamaica divestment, these costs will add to already heavy fiscal and debt burdens.

Fiscal-responsibility legislation is a fundamental departure in trying to increase certainty in fiscal performance in Jamaica. The available documentation speaks to institutional and managerial reform which may appear to place the burden of fiscal responsibility on the institutions and the public servants. The concept of fiscal responsibility has, at its core however, the concept of political responsibility for fiscal performance.

holding people accountable

In holding the political directorate and public administration to public account, fiscal-responsibility laws may lean more heavily towards legislated fiscal targets or towards informational and operational transparency. Putting targets in law is very appealing to an instinct that somebody gets "locked up" for missing the targets. And then we ask "Who?". And then we realise any deviation can be excused in the English language and that legislated targets are not so binding after all.

The alternative is to maximise the public availability of information before, during and after the Budget, subject to constraints of peculiar sensitivity (e.g. exchange rate forecasts). This information should include historical performance, policy objectives and intentions, short- and medium-term projections, and risks to attainment. This is expected to facilitate informed public critical perspectives and a means of keeping politicians and administrators focused on and faithful to their stated objectives. The success of the transparency initiative is dependent on the state of public education and understanding and the vigilance of the press in the public interest.

To the extent that a fiscal responsibility framework is designed to enhance political and administrative fidelity to prudent economic management, it would be appropriate for draft legislation to be supported by public education and public discussion. Jamaica does not need more cosmetic legislation.

Colin F. Bullock is lecturer in the Department of Economics, UWI, Mona. Feedback may be sent to columns@gleanerjm.com.






Home | Lead Stories | News | Business | Sport | Commentary | Letters | Entertainment | Arts &Leisure | Outlook | In Focus | International | Auto |