I think the stories in The Sunday Gleaner about the former Bank of Jamaica governor and his mansion etc, misrepresent the issues badly.

But someone needs to ask ... if the contract with the former governor was repugnant, how come Aubyn Hill's nearly $2 million per month represents value for money?

Could The Gleaner investigate and tell us what features in the former governor's contract were different from those of his predecessors?

Balance is important and Parliament is being used to advance selfish agendas.

I am, etc.,

CONCERNED CITIZEN

Mandeville